Thank you so much Luciana for that wonderful introduction, and my thanks and appreciation to the members of the Leahy Committee for this honour and recognition.
I'd like to take this opportunity to share a few personal reflections. I'll begin by saying that the path to my receiving this award today began in the University of British Columbia’s Masters of Archival Studies (MAS) Programme. While enrolled in the MAS I took many excellent courses, but the one I loved the most was records management, with my professor Reuben Ware.
At this time in North America, the field of archivists was just emerging as a profession separate from history or library science (as some of you may recall) and there was a debate between those who adhered to the tradition of historian / archivist and those who saw themselves as an administrator/ archivist.
Inspired by my course in records management and the ideas of Margaret Cross Norton, I formed a professional identity as a records/manager archivist managing and preserving archives to enable efficient administration and public accountability.
Today, the MAS programme at UBC has launched the professional archival careers of hundreds of students who are already recognized leaders in our field and beyond. There is also the Certificate Programme in Records Management, which I launched with former University of the West Indies Archivist, Brian Speirs in 1997, and which the current University Archivist of the West Indies, Sharon Alexander-Gooding, who is herself a graduate of UBC’s MAS programme, observes has been going strong and has provided professional education and launched the careers of hundreds of Caribbean records and information management professionals My education has given me a wonderful career as a records professional, and I know from the messages and achievements of my former students that their educations have similarly unlocked their potential as individuals, as records professionals and as contributors to society. Education is key.
In a Guinea Pig's perspective on the MAS programme, written in 1983, Shelley Sweeney wrote, “We are at a turning point in our profession. From this point we can forge ahead by continuing to support advanced education for the archivist, we can dither in indecision and go nowhere, or we can languish and begin to regress by lowering our standards.” Her words are still relevant today. We must continue to forge ahead on advanced education for our profession by strengthening the programs we already have and by developing new programs, and we must articulate high standards of education for the records profession. We must not be complacent.
Just as we cannot afford to be complacent about education, we cannot afford to be complacent about transparency and public accountability, the bedrock of democratic society.
As every archivist will appreciate, transparency, which enables public accountability, is predicated upon capturing and preserving authentic public records.
From my vantage point at the World Bank this year, I have seen many examples of the erosion of public transparency and transparency mechanisms. Take the country of Yemen as an example. The country recently passed one of the strongest right to Information laws in the world. I had the privilege of supporting the Yemeni Information Commissioner with implementation of the law earlier this year. In late January, however, Houthi rebels seized the Presidential palace, kidnapped the President's chief of staff and held the President captive. These actions led the country's government to collapse. Now the country is afflicted with strife and conflict, and there is a growing humanitarian crisis. I hope that soon the situation in the country will improve again, and that efforts can continue to make Yemen a peaceful, just and inclusive society.
We are so lucky in Canada. We have none of the problems Yemen now faces. We have transparency, public accountability and the rule of law. Or so we think, until one considers the destruction of the long gun registry and the flouting of the National Archives of Canada Act and recent allegations of systemic destruction of records that should be available under BC's Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act. When I look around, I see so many examples of public officials – not just in Canada - exploiting new forms of digital communication to hide from accountability. Are we sleepwalking into the death of our democratic rights?
As individual records professionals, we have a role to play in ensuring this does not happen by fulfilling our profession duty to capture and preserve authentic records. Public archival institutions have a role to play in instituting the policy and legal frameworks that enable us to perform our responsibilities as public records professionals. Public archives function as key public accountability mechanisms. Indeed, modern public archives emerged out of the French Revolution and the Messidor decree of 1793. While other public accountability mechanisms, such as FOI, have independent oversight bodies that report to legislatures and sit outside of the executive branch of governments, public archives lack such independent oversight. This makes them unable to resist such actions as deliberate and obvious flouting of archives and public records laws and to develop and enforce better digital record keeping practices. In some jurisdictions, information commissioners are playing this role on a de facto basis. So, I urge the community of records professionals to develop more formal relations with information commissioners, and to call collectively for independent oversight of public archives.
Luciana, thank you again for this honour. Colleagues, thank you for your attention. I wish you all a wonderful conference, and bright “Archival Horizons.”